NCCLS and voluntary consensus standards for the clinical laboratory.
نویسنده
چکیده
We are all aware that in the last two decades there has been an explosive growth in the development and production of analytical instrumentation and reagents for use in the clinical laboratory. It was obvious that much. of this growth was uncontrolled and determined largely by market-place factors and the assessments of individual professionals. Professional societies did take a role in tryingto ensure that diagnostic products and procedures were accurate, reliable, and useful for patient care. Several of the more directly involved organizations-e.g., the American Association of Clinical Chemists, the College of American Pathologists, the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, and othershad created committees dedicated to the development of clinical laboratory standards. However, the activities of these groups were narrow in scope and composition, and there were no mechanisms for widespread review and adoption of the output of the committees by either industry or laboratory professionals. Voluntary standards originated by limited groups of professionals did not have the impact required to overcome economic and other important parochial concerns of manufacturers and users. In 1967 a group of professionals representing several laboratory disciplines, met for the purpose of organizing an intersociety organization which could develop voluntary standards on a broad consensus basis. Leaders in this effort included Drs. Howard Bodily, Russell Eilers, E. M. Flipse, Andrew Fodor, James Griffitts, Ralph Thiers, and Mr. J. J. Moran, and they enlisted the support of other interested laboratorians. It was important for this new approach that all of the component contributors to clinical laboratory operation (professional staff, government agencies, and manufacturers) be represented in the decision-making process. In 1968, the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS)
منابع مشابه
NCCLS simplifies the order of draw: a brief history.
he order in which tubes should be filled seems to mutate daily into increasingly creative incarnations. In fact, it mutated right out of existence last year when one workshop presenter astonished her attendees by stating, “There is no order of draw.” Adding to the confusion are Internet phlebotomy sites, training manuals, certification study guides, and textbooks that perpetuate many variations...
متن کاملSusceptibility Testing in Animals - How Breakpoints Are Derived and Interpretation of Susceptibility Data
SUSCEPTIBILITY TESTS Antibacterial susceptibility testing is not necessary for every case in veterinary medicine because the majority of cases can be treated empirically. But performed properly, antibiotic susceptibility results are helpful to select proper antibacterial therapy for patients with refractory infections, seriously ill animals, or when resistant strains of bacteria are suspected. ...
متن کاملCommentary: National and international collaboration for instrumentation in health care laboratories
The professions connected with health care laboratories have come to rely heavily on complex instruments and it is therefore not surprising that much has been done over the last two decades to rationalise design and efficiency and stimulate collaboration nationally and internationally between those practising within the profession itself, and those in the associated production industry. At the ...
متن کاملDevelopment of standards for laboratory automation.
In clinical laboratories, the installation of total laboratory automation systems and/or modular systems has grown dramatically in the 1990s, particularly in the US, Japan, and Europe. As the number of installations and level of interest grew, several individuals and corporations active in the automation field recognized that the development of prospective standards might enable customers of su...
متن کاملCollaborative study of the NCCLS and flow cytometry methods for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans.
One hundred clinical isolates of Candida albicans were tested for amphotericin B and fluconazole susceptibilities by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) broth microdilution test at center 1 (C1). The same isolates were tested blinded at center 2 (C2) by NCCLS and flow cytometry (FC) methods. The agreement between NCCLS and FC methods ranged from 96 to 99%.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical chemistry
دوره 21 10 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1975